Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-07-19 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2912 x 1224 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 458 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4780mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mix Flip is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having an 83.2 score against 80.9. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mix Flip has a newer 14 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, counting with a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Mix Flip has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density and a little bit worse 1224 x 2912px resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger screen. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi Mix Flip, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor.
The Xiaomi Mix Flip features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mix Flip shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Xiaomi Mix Flip counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4780mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.