Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is better than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's 80.8 global score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G were only released 8 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is notably heavier but noticeably thinner than the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better performance than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a display that's just as good as the display in Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little lower display density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a bigger screen.
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.