Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting a global score of 88.1 against 78.2. Even though Apple iPhone X is way older than Xiaomi Poco M3, it's design is thinner and lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has 2 lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X has a sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a bit better display density. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos.
The Apple iPhone X features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.