Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a global score of 78.2, which is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco M3 has the older 10 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Although the Xiaomi Poco M3 is better than Honor 50 Pro, it must be told that it is also thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a little bit larger display, a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1236 x 2676. The Honor 50 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a much more MP camera in the back. The Honor 50 Pro has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much longer battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.