Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having a 92.1 score against 78.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design body is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3's, although it is heavier.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1280 x 2800 resolution. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a much better video resolution, a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera in the back with more megapixels and a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has just a bit longer battery duration than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5600mAh.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.