Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a global score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the HTC U11's 77.6 score. Although the Xiaomi Poco M3 is way newer than the HTC U11, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. HTC U11 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The HTC U11 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.