Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with a better resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.