Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.78 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 general score. Even when Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Xiaomi Poco M3 were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is way thinner and a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, so it offers a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Xiaomi Poco M3 has more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has an 82 percent more battery size.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.