Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design weights the same than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's a bit thinner.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixels density.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a much better 64 MP resolution camera and better video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.