Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-08 | -- |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more brightness and a little bit higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better video quality and a larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has superior battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.