Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the iPhone 11 Pro's global score of 84.9. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older and a bit thicker than iPhone 11 Pro, it's body is still a little lighter. IPhone 11 Pro has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a just a little higher screen pixels density and way more brightness.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a camera that's just as good as Xiaomi Pocophone F1's camera, and although the iPhone 11 Pro has a bigger aperture, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has better battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.