Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-08-29 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting a score of 85.5 against 80.3. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a way newer device than the Google Nexus 6P, but it is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P has a bit better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a lower (4K) video definition and a smaller sensor, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.