Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Google Pixel XL, getting an 85.5 score against 81.3. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is newer than Google Pixel XL's, although it's a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel XL counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality, a back-facing camera with a lower 12 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.