Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is incredibly newer and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it's also a bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.