Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is way newer and much thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is a bit heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse video quality and a camera in the back with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.