Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50, having a overall score of 85.5 against 81.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a somewhat thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 50, but they have the same weight. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a little more pixels per inch of display, much more display brightness and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera, a larger aperture and a much bigger sensor. Motorola Edge 50 features greater battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.