Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 general score. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older than the Moto G Stylus, it's construction is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better memory for apps and games than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Moto G Stylus's battery duration is just as good as Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery performance. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.