Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is a little lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's just a bit thicker and was released 3 years before. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px and a higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor, a larger aperture and a back camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.