Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than Galaxy A32, having a general score of 85.5 against 84.7. Although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is incredibly older than the Galaxy A32, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2246 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 768 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A32 has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.