Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, having a 91.8 score against 85.5. The Galaxy A71 5G design is newer and a little thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it is a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G has a superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.