Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting an 85.5 score against 81. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is noticeably thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's a bit lighter and also newer. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, a bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy C9 Pro's battery performance is just as good as the battery performance in Xiaomi Pocophone F1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.