Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is extremely newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's much thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM and more cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.