Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 77.8. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is notably older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much brighter screen, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a larger screen and a just a little higher display density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 50 MP resolution camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.