Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having an 82 score against 71.7. The iPhone XR is a newer and a bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, although it's heavier. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime and the iPhone XR feature similar displays, because although the iPhone XR has a bit worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a lot worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display. The Apple iPhone XR features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.