Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having an 83.4 score against 71.7. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is notably newer and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, although it's incredibly heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a really larger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much more MP back camera and a much better video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.