Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's overall score of 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, but it's also just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A50 has a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a much bigger diafragm aperture and a much better 25 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A50 costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.