Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having an 86.6 score against 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it is also a bit heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A50s features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.