Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a 91.1 score against 71.7. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is notably newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels count per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52s counts with a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a bigger aperture for better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.