Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with an 85.2 score against 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a way bigger diafragm aperture and a lot better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.