Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a general score of 98.9 against 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner, but way heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a really bigger display, a little higher display pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a much better video resolution and a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.