Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a overall score of 88.3 against 71.7. Galaxy S10's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040, a just a little higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a bigger screen. Galaxy S10 has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has superior battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.