Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting an 86.3 score against 71.7. Galaxy S10e's body is noticeably newer, thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a quite lower pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy S10e has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S10e takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy S10e counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S10e, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.