Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a 93.4 score against 71.7. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has older 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy S22 body is noticeably newer and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, although it's also a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S22 captures greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a way better resolution camera in the back, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.