Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a overall score of 79.5 against 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a just a little lighter and thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, even though both were released only 8 months apart. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy S7 features a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S7 takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lesser mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a much larger camera aperture.
Galaxy S7 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S7 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S7 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.