Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a global score of 94.6 against 71.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it is also notably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better (4K) video quality. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.