Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a global score of 79.9 against 78.2. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a way newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T.
The Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have a display with the same size, the same pixel density and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a way tinier sensor offering a much worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.