Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 score. The Galaxy A52 is a thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a little bit better amount of pixels in each display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Galaxy A52 takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher video resolution, a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.