Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a 78.2 score against 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A70, although it is a bit heavier and thicker. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should offer all the same OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A70 and Xiaomi Redmi 9T both feature very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.