Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is extremely older than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.