Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having an 88.3 score against 78.2. The Galaxy S10 is an older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but it is extremely lighter and thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it gives some additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Galaxy S10 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 76% greater battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.