Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 78.2. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it offers some extra features. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is just a bit lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even though they were released only a couple of months apart.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has superior battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.