Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with an 82.6 score against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and a lot thinner device than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, so it provides a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit higher display density. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a more mega-pixels camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.