Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Redmi 9T were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is incredibly heavier but also much thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.