Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a score of 78.2, which is a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S design is much newer, but a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the HTC U11. HTC U11 has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has just a bit better display than HTC U11, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display. HTC U11 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U11 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The HTC U11 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a way better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.