Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 global score. Although the Galaxy Note7 is notably older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's construction is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little worse display pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.