Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 72.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2012-05-03 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 4.71 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 220.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is slightly better than Galaxy S III, having a score of 78.2 against 72.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S III. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has newer 11 version and Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, so it provides the user some extra features and increased performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a way brighter screen, a greater display pixels density, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a back facing camera with much more MP and a lot larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S III, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy S III, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.