Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's general score of 78.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S were released only 7 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely heavier but also somewhat thinner. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give the same OS features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.