Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2025-01-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Coral Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.86 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, with a 75.8 score against 71.6. The Galaxy S7 Active features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has 4 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster). The Galaxy S7 Active has a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has a way smaller screen and much less brightness.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G also has a much higher resolution camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5110mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.