Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a global score of 81.6 against 71.8. The Google Pixel 2 body is lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, even though they were only released with a few months difference. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920px, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 2 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments and a way higher video definition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also cheap compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.