Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting a score of 78.9 against 71.8. These phones include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a way newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it is a bit heavier.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a display that is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's display, although the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 resolution, a little larger display and a quite higher display pixel density. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a CPU that's very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.